Option ranges

Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):107–118 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An option range is a set of alternative actions available to an agent at a given time. I ask how a moral theory’s account of option ranges relates to its recommendations about deliberative procedure (DP) and criterion of rightness (CR). I apply this question to Act Consequentialism (AC), which tells us, at any time, to perform the action with the best consequences in our option range then. If anyone can employ this command as a DP, or assess (direct or indirect) compliance with it as a CR, someone must be able to tell which actions fit this description. Since the denseness of possibilia entails that any option range is indefinitely large, no one can do this. So no one can know that any option has ever emerged from any range as the best option in that range. However we come to know that a given option is right, we never come to know it in AC’s way. It is often observed that AC cannot give us a DP. AC cannot give us a CR either, unless we are omniscient. So Act Consequentialism is useless

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
254 (#48,496)

6 months
15 (#66,666)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sophie Grace Chappell
Open University (UK)

Citations of this work

Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Defending the unity of knowledge. [REVIEW]Timothy Chappell - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):532–538.
On Indirectly Self-defeating Moral Theories.Eric Wiland - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (3):384-393.
Informed consent and justified hard paternalism.Emma Cecelia Bullock - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references