On Cute Monkeys and Repulsive Monsters

Hastings Center Report 48 (6):12-14 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When I heard that a laboratory in China had cloned two long‐tailed macaques, I thought of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein. When academics write about the novel, many point out that the reason the creature becomes a “monster” is not that he has any inherently evil qualities but that Victor Frankenstein, the creature's “mother,” immediately rejects him. All later problems can be traced to the fact that Frankenstein does not take responsibility for his creation. While I do not disagree with this, we need to think beyond (or before) Frankenstein's rejection to the reason he rejects it. I would like to suggest that this reason reveals something about how bioethics judges new biological technologies. I suggest that what causes Frankenstein to feel revulsion toward his creation is its unsettling mix of the beautiful and the ugly.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cute Studies.Pansy Duncan - 2014 - Cultural Studies Review 20 (1).
Where monsters dwell.David Israel & John Perry - 1996 - In Jerry Seligman & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Language and Computation. Csli Publications, Stanford. pp. 1--303.
Modal monsters and talk about fiction.Stefano Predelli - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (3):277-297.
“How monkeys see the world.” Why monkeys?A. H. Harcourt - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):160-161.
Monsters and Philosophy.Charles T. Wolfe (ed.) - 2005 - College Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-27

Downloads
15 (#914,752)

6 months
9 (#288,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tod Chambers
Northwestern University

References found in this work

Culture and Practical Reason.Marshall Sahlins - 1978 - Science and Society 42 (2):232-235.

Add more references