Journal of Business Ethics 159 (4):943-960 (2019)

The sharing economy has been examined from many angles, including the engagement of customers, the capabilities of the technological platforms, and the experiences of those who sell products or services. We focus on labor in the sharing economy. Labor has been regarded as one type of asset exchanged in the sharing economy, as part of the customer interface when services are sold, or as a party vulnerable to exploitation. We focus on labor as a position in relationship to owners of capital. While new typologies to characterize the sharing economy are emerging, we argue that a well-established framework that has been applied across historic types of work arrangements can offer a robust analysis of enduring and new labor issues. We draw upon labor process theory from early formulations to recent applications to guide an analysis appropriate to the sharing economy. We use both central and less explored concepts from LPT and use Uber as a case to illustrate application of the framework. By considering labor, capital, and the power dynamics between them, we draw attention to unequal exchange and distributive justice, fundamental for taking a business ethics approach to labor in the sharing economy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04210-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Brief History of Neoliberalism.David Harvey - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis. [REVIEW]Michelle R. Greenwood - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 36 (3):261 - 278.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Insights From Ifaluk: Food Sharing Among Cooperative Fishers.Richard Sosis - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):568-569.
Qualities of Sharing and Their Transformations in the Digital Age.Andreas Wittel - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 15 (9):2011.
The Self-Dual Serial Cost-Sharing Rule.M. J. Albizuri - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (4):555-567.
Digital Desire in the Daydream Machine.Randal Doane - 2006 - Sociological Theory 24 (2):150 - 169.
Sharing Democracy.Michaele L. Ferguson - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science?Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Openness in the Social Sciences: Sharing Data.Joan E. Sieber - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):69 – 86.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #729,132 of 2,499,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes