How Should Feminist Autonomy Theorists Respond to the Problem of Internalized Oppression?

Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):409-428 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Autonomy and the Feminist Intuition,” Natalie Stoljar asks whether a procedural or a substantive approach to autonomy is best for addressing feminist concerns. In this paper, I build on Stoljar’s argument that feminists should adopt a strong substantive approach to autonomy. After briefly reviewing the problems with a purely procedural approach, I begin to articulate my own strong substantive theory by focusing specifically on the problem of internalized oppression. In the final section, I briefly address some of the concerns raised by procedural theorists who are leery of a substantive approach.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,035

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Normative competence, autonomy, and oppression.J. Y. Lee - 2022 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1).
Against authenticity: Autonomy and oppressive circumstances.Maite Rodríguez Apólito - 2024 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 50 (5):803-822.
Normative competence, autonomy, and oppression.Ji-Young Lee - 2022 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1).
Nondomination and the Limits of Relational Autonomy.Danielle M. Wenner - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2):28-48.
Autonomy and the Problem of Socialization.Suzy Killmister - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (1):95-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
212 (#117,365)

6 months
14 (#201,686)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sonya Charles
Cleveland State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references