Enforcing the Law and Being a State

Law and Philosophy 31 (1):99-123 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many anarchists believe that a stateless society could and should feature laws. It might appear that, in so believing, they are caught in a contradiction. The anarchist objects to the state because its authority does not rest on actual consent, and using force to secure compliance with law in a stateless society seems objectionable for the same reason. Some people in a stateless society will have consented to some laws or law-generating mechanisms and some to others – while some will have consented to none. Someone’s obedience to a legal requirement could be justly enforceable absent the state, nonetheless, given either her actual consent to the requirement or to a mechanism responsible for generating it or the coextensiveness of the legal requirement with a moral requirement. And it could thus be just on the anarchist’s own terms to enforce a narrow range of positive legal requirements even against outlaws who had declined to consent to them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-14

Downloads
51 (#277,782)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Chartier
La Sierra University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references