Empiricist Activity is Not Scientific Activity: A Philosophical Critique of Process-Product Research on Teaching

Dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Process-Product research uses observation, experiment and statistics to attempt to show that some ways of teaching are superior to others. There is a difference between scientific research and empiricist research, and Process-Product research is empiricist rather than scientific as its practitioners claim. Both empiricist and scientific research are however empirical, i.e. both attempt to discover and explain the world of empirical phenomena. ;The striking differences between scientific and empiricist enterprizes are demonstrated through comparing examples from astronomy and physics, chemistry, biology and the earth sciences, with paradigmatic Process-Product studies. ;Science makes use of several different kinds of theory; it involves rational connection between abstract concepts, and isomorphism to the empiricial world; it uses mathematics and ratio scales; as a result it develops formidable theories. It explains, predicts, and applies with precision in technologies. In contrast, Process-Product's empiricist activity largely ignores theory and any claims to theory are hortatory; it involves empiricist connection between general concepts, does not provide isomorphism, uses statistics, and nominal and ordinal scales rather than interval or ratio ones; it provides ceteris paribus, and commonsense explanations, and statistical probabilities not predictions; thus Process-Product is not scientific but sophisticatedly empiricist in a statistical way. ;This confusion between scientific and empiricist research leaves Process-Product in a no-man's land where it is impossible for it to be effective scientifically or truly effective in an empiricist manner. Despite its laudable aims it has achieved very little, but may be able to redeem itself in either of two ways. ;First, it can attempt to make itself scientific through developing scientific theory which amongst other things; must include abstract concepts. Or second, and much more realizable, Process-Product researchers can unashamedly recognize the empiricist status of their research, realize what this means for future developments, and modify their methodology to make it more empiricistically congent. This will involve taking into account humanistic and normative critiques, the many different kinds of relevant theory, and the vast complexity of teaching: all three of which it corrently ignores. In short it must be embedded in a practical theory of pedagogy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science Teaching as Educational Interrogation of Scientific Research.Dimitri Ginev - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):584-597.
Desgabets as a cartesian empiricist.Monte Cook - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 501-515.
Transforming the Object in Product Design.Sampsa Hyysalo - 2002 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 4 (1):59-83.
Reflections on Peirce's Concepts of Testability and the Economy of Research.Jeff Foss - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:28 - 39.
Scientific Problems: Three Empiricist Models.Thomas Nickles - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:3 - 19.
Understanding scientific study via process modeling.Robert W. P. Luk - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (1):49-78.
Value of the Commodity and Intellectual Labour.Tuytsyn Yury - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:117-123.
Scientific objectivity and the logics of science.H. E. Longino - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):85 – 106.
Structure: Its shadow and substance.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):275-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references