Does Increased Equity Ownership Lead to More Strategically Involved Boards?

Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):267 - 277 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Jay Lorsch, boards will be increasingly expected to exercise more leadership, even strategic leadership, in the running of a firm. In order to align directors to the best interest of the firm, directors are increasingly required to purchase the equity of the companies on whose board they serve, and in the majority of cases, the minimum shareholding is 1000 shares. The rationale for this is that the directors will take the perspective of real owners of the company, partly based on a study by the National Association of Corporate Directors in 1995. Using behavioral economics, this paper makes some counterintuitive predictions about how involved boards are likely to react to an offer for a hostile takeover. By studying their reactions, the paper inductively analyzes the use of equity ownership as an incentive mechanism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation.Jia Wang & H. Dudley Dewhirst - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):115 - 123.
Family pyramidal holdings and board of directors.Najah Attig - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):394-406.
Are Director Equity Policies Exclusionary?Dan R. Dalton - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):415-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#324,970)

6 months
5 (#565,734)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Private Equity and the Public Good.Kevin Morrell & Ian Clark - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (2):249 - 263.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references