Aristotle’s Nicomachean Function Argument

Philosophical Inquiry 41 (2-3):95-104 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1105235X

DOI

10.5840/philinquiry2017412/318

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Aristotle's Argument for a Human Function.Rachel Barney - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34:293-322.
The Limits of Eudaimonia in the Nicomachean Ethics.Schwartz Daniel - 2016 - Journal of Greco-Roman Studies 55 (3):35-52.
Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.Rachana Kamtekar - 2016 - Ancient Philosophy 36 (1):214-221.
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: An Introduction.Michael Pakaluk - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Concept of Ergon: Towards An Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle's 'Function Argument'.Samuel H. Baker - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48:227-266.
Aspasius on Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 8. With Anonymous Paraphrase of Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 8 and 9. And, Michael of Ephesus on Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 9.David Aspasius, Michael & Konstan - 2001
What it is for a Human to Function as a Human Being: Objections to Aristotle’s Function Argument.Yinlin Guan - unknown
Found in Translation: Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics 3.5, 1113b7-8 and its Reception.Susanne Bobzien - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45:103-148.
The Role of the Ergon Argument in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.Deborah Achtenberg - 1989 - Ancient Philosophy 9 (1):37-47.
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics 3.5, 1113b7-8 and Free Choice.Susanne Bobzien - 2014 - In R. Salles P. Destree (ed.), What is up to us? Studies on Causality and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Academia Verlag.
Happiness and Aristotle’s Definition of Eudaimonia.Carlotta Capuccino - 2013 - Philosophical Topics 41 (1):1-26.
Is Aristotle's Function Argument Fallacious? Part 1, Groundwork.Gavin Lawrence - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (1-2):191-224.
Review of Aristotle’s Ethics, by David Bostock. [REVIEW]Jonathan J. Sanford - 2002 - Essays in Philosophy 3 (1):84-88.
Aristotle on Friendship, Being an Expanded Translation of the Nicomachean Ethics, Books Viii & Ix.Geoffrey Percival - 1940 - Cambridge University Press.
Many students of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics recognize the value of comparisons between Aristotle and modern moralists. We are familiar with some of the ways in which reflection on Hume, Kant, Mill, Sidgwick, and more recent moral theorists can throw light on Aristotle. The light may come either from recognition of similarities or from a sharper awareness of differences.“Themes ancient and modern” is a familiar part of the contemporary study of Aristotle that needs no further commendation. [REVIEW]Natural Law Aquinas & Aristotelian Eudaimonism - 2006 - In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-16

Downloads
155 (#117,732)

6 months
14 (#151,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references