AI employment decision-making: integrating the equal opportunity merit principle and explainable AI
AI and Society:1-12 (forthcoming)
Abstract
Artificial intelligence tools used in employment decision-making cut across the multiple stages of job advertisements, shortlisting, interviews and hiring, and actual and potential bias can arise in each of these stages. One major challenge is to mitigate AI bias and promote fairness in opaque AI systems. This paper argues that the equal opportunity merit principle is an ethical approach for fair AI employment decision-making. Further, explainable AI can mitigate the opacity problem by placing greater emphasis on enhancing the understanding of reasonable users and affected persons as to the AI output. Both the equal opportunity merit principle and explainable AI should be integrated in the design and implementation of AI employment decision-making systems so as to ensure, as far as possible, that the AI output is arrived at through a fair process.DOI
10.1007/s00146-022-01532-w
My notes
Similar books and articles
Against competitive equal opportunity.Paul Gomberg - 1995 - Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (3):59-73.
Algorithmic and human decision making: for a double standard of transparency.Mario Günther & Atoosa Kasirzadeh - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (1):375-381.
Equality of Opportunity Globalized?Darrel Moellendorf - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2).
Equality of opportunity and opportunity dominance.Matthias Hild & Alex Voorhoeve - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):117-145.
Each outcome is another opportunity: Problems with the moment of equal opportunity.Clare Chambers - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):374-400.
Why equal opportunity is not a valuable goal.Stephen Kershnar - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):159–172.
The Ethical Action Principle in Decision-Making: From the Principle of Autonomy to the Principle of Consensus.Kumiko Yoshitake - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 5:75-83.
A Test of the Principle of Optimality.John D. Hey & Enrica Carbone - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):263-281.
Capability as Opportunity: How Amartya Sen Revises Equal Opportunity.Harlan Beckley - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (1):107 - 135.
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
Merit: The History of a Founding Ideal From the American Revolution to the Twenty-First Century.Joseph F. Kett - 2012 - Cornell University Press.
Luck, Opportunity and Disability.Cynthia A. Stark - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (3):383-402.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-07-14
Downloads
12 (#806,220)
6 months
9 (#96,348)
2022-07-14
Downloads
12 (#806,220)
6 months
9 (#96,348)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Equality and equal opportunity for welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms.Jenna Burrell - 2016 - Big Data and Society 3 (1):205395171562251.
Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality.R. M. Dworkin - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):377-389.