A Challenge To Ethical Sceptism And Relativism

Philosophy and Culture 27 (5):410-429 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human beings are rational, we can distinguish between right and wrong, true and false knowledge, or facts, however, because of theoretical complexity, coupled with different customs and education, cognitive, inevitably errors, especially in the ethical and moral aspects, is more confusing, difficult to distinguish the correct reason that happened skepticism and relativism, the idea of the truth, we do not here on, we are only on the ethical aspects to be examined. In ancient Greece gave rise to skepticism and ethical relativism, in modern times more people insist, does not recognize a uniform or universal model exists, in fact, this is wrong, no matter who the ethics of ancient and modern, and even advocates suspect or theory of relativity no exception, when they believe that the line of good and evil as to avoid, enough, this recognition, not to recognize the universality of moral or ethical, the absolute nature of it? Ethical skepticism or relativism advocates no doubt of their doctrine, and are not caught in self-denial, and to their claim, there is generally a model of value?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references