Defining Risk, Motivating Responsibility and Rethinking Global Warming

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):489-499 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper breaks with the sociological notion of ‘risk society’ and argues in favour of a philosophical view that sees the two planetary threats of late modernity, nuclear weapons and global warming, as ultimate challenges to morality and politics rather than risks that we can take and manage. The paper also raises the question of why we should feel responsible for the effects of these two global challenges on future generations and in this sense elaborates on the transgenerational chain of parenthood rather than on considerations of justice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ecological issues of justice.Robin Attfield - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):147-154.
Classics and Global Warming.J. A. Towey - 2008 - Classics Broadsheet (125).
Global warming as analytic tip.Emery M. Roe - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2):411-427.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-07

Downloads
51 (#305,341)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?