- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank [Book Review]
Silvia Cervo, Jane Rovina, Renato Talamini, Tiziana Perin, Vincenzo Canzonieri, Paolo De Paoli & Agostino Steffan
BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):30 (2013)
Abstract
Efforts to improve patients’ understanding of their own medical treatments or research in which they are involved are progressing, especially with regard to informed consent procedures. We aimed to design a multisource informed consent procedure that is easily adaptable to both clinical and research applications, and to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of understanding and awareness, even in less educated patientsLinks
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- europepmc.org
(no proxy) - link.springer.com (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [2] (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [3] (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [4] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [2] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [3] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [4] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [5] (no proxy)
- ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Informed consent: a primer for clinical practice.Deborah Bowman - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by John Spicer & Rehana Iqbal.
Research without consent: Exception from and waiver of informed consent in resuscitation research.Michelle H. Biros - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):361-369.
Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico. [REVIEW]Emma L. Verástegui - 2006 - BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-12.
Informed consent procedure for clinical trials in emergency settings: The polish perspective.Piotr S. Iwanowski - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):333-336.
Biobanks--When is Re-consent Necessary?K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study. [REVIEW]Ronald Kiguba, Paul Kutyabami, Stephen Kiwuwa, Elly Katabira & Nelson Sewankambo - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):21-.
Medical risk and the right to an informed consent in clinical care and clinical research.Dennis John Mazur - 1998 - Tampa, Fla.: American College of Physician Executives.
The limits of consent: a socio-ethical approach to human subject research in medicine.Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: A qualitative pilot study. [REVIEW]Susan S. Khalil, Henry J. Silverman, May Raafat, Samer El-Kamary & Maged El-Setouhy - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):9.
Withdrawing from Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-08-01
Downloads
81 (#202,650)
6 months
4 (#790,687)
2013-08-01
Downloads
81 (#202,650)
6 months
4 (#790,687)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Research participants’ perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.Flavio D'Abramo, Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):60.
Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks.Michiel Verlinden, Herman Nys, Nadine Ectors & Isabelle Huys - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-10.
Assessment of knowledge about biobanking among healthcare students and their willingness to donate biospecimens.Leena Merdad, Lama Aldakhil, Rawan Gadi, Mourad Assidi, Salina Y. Saddick, Adel Abuzenadah, Jim Vaught, Abdelbaset Buhmeida & Mohammed H. Al-Qahtani - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):32.
References found in this work
Building on relationships of trust in biobank research.M. G. Hansson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):415-418.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Research understanding, attitude and awareness towards biobanking: a survey among Italian twin participants to a genetic epidemiological study.Virgilia Toccaceli, Corrado Fagnani, Lorenza Nisticò, Cristina D'Ippolito, Lorenzo Giannantonio, Sonia Brescianini & Maria Stazi - 2009 - BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):4.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo