Counterspeech

Philosophy Compass 18 (1):e12890 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Counterspeech is communication that tries to counteract potential harm brought about by other speech. Theoretical interest in counterspeech partly derives from a libertarian ideal – as captured in the claim that the solution to bad speech is more speech – and partly from a recognition that well-meaning attempts to counteract harm through speech can easily misfire or backfire. Here we survey recent work on the question of what makes counterspeech effective at remedying or preventing harm, in those cases where it is effective, as well as work investigating when and why there is a duty to engage in counterspeech. We suggest that the most fruitful area for philosophical inquiry on this topic, currently, relates to the questions about efficacy. Specifically, we argue that there is a need for better frameworks for conceptualizing the efficacy of counterspeech. Philosophers have collaborative work to do, alongside social scientists, in developing these frameworks

Similar books and articles

Law as Counterspeech.Anjalee de Silva & Robert Mark Simpson - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):493-510.
Narrative Counterspeech.Maxime C. Lepoutre - forthcoming - Political Studies.
Hateful Counterspeech.Maxime Lepoutre - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):533-554.
Corporate Counterspeech.Aaron Ancell - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):611-625.
A Republican Conception of Counterspeech.Suzanne Whitten - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):555-575.
How to talk back: hate speech, misinformation, and the limits of salience.Rachel Fraser - 2023 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 22 (3):315-335.
Counterspeech and Ordinary Citizens: How? When?Corrado Fumagalli - 2021 - Political Theory 49 (6):1021-1047.
Should Democracies Ban Hate Speech? Hate Speech Laws and Counterspeech.Enes Kulenović - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):511-532.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-01

Downloads
628 (#30,518)

6 months
320 (#7,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Maxime C. Lepoutre
University of Reading
Bianca Cepollaro
Institut Jean Nicod
Robert Mark Simpson
University College London

References found in this work

No-Platforming and Higher-Order Evidence, or Anti-Anti-No-Platforming.Neil Levy - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (4):487-502.
Language and Race.Rae Langton, Sally Haslanger & Luvell Anderson - 2012 - In Gillian Russell Delia Graff Fara (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. Routledge. pp. 753-767.
Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures.Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2):202-227.
Bending as Counterspeech.Laura Caponetto & Bianca Cepollaro - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):577-593.

View all 21 references / Add more references