“A Child Has Been Born unto Us”: Arendt on Birth

philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 4 (1):12-30 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:“A Child Has Been Born unto Us”Arendt on BirthAdriana CavareroTranslated by Silvia Guslandi and Cosette BruhnsIn The Human Condition, at the end of the dense chapter on action, Hannah Arendt reiterates that action, that is, the political faculty for excellence, “is ontologically rooted” in the fact of natality, “like an ever-present reminder that men, though they must die, are not born in order to die but in order to begin” (Arendt 1998, 246).1 To reinforce this argument, Arendt compares action to miracles, and makes an interesting and, as we will see, somewhat perplexing reference to the Bible:[The miracle] is, in other words, the birth of new men and the new beginning, the action they are capable of by virtue of being born. Only the full experience of this capacity can bestow upon human affairs faith and hope, those two essential characteristics of human existence which Greek antiquity ignored altogether.…It is this faith in and hope for the world that found perhaps its most glorious and most succinct expression in the few words with which the Gospels announced their “glad tidings”: “A child has been born unto us.”(HC, 247)The citation is suggestive, but incorrect. In the Gospels, which do announce with true joy the birth of the child, the phrase as it is quoted here does not exist. It appears instead in Isaiah (9:6), translated into English both as “For to us a child is borne,” and, in the version of the King James Bible from which Arendt is plausibly drawing, as “For unto us a child is born.” The error, if indeed it is an error, is thus twofold (see Young-Ah Gottlieb 2003, 136ff.), since [End Page 12] both the passage referenced and the words cited are incorrect. That Arendt frequently cites from memory, and that the citations tend to be bibliographically incorrect, is known to her interpreters, but in this case the error ends up being quite significant. As is well known, the prophetic text carries a strong Messianic burden, and such a burden would trouble significantly the thesis that Arendt is here illustrating; the Gospels’ message creates instead fewer obstacles to her strategy of framing the meaning of birth within the mundane horizon that in her vocabulary takes the names of “world” or “worldliness.” Since “‘to live’ and to ‘be among men’” mean the same thing (HC, 7), the child, every newborn, that is, every human being that makes its entrance in the world, is not, according to the Arendtian vision, born to us, coming from elsewhere, but appears among us here. The scenario of birth, like that of action, whatever be the holy text that mentions or exemplarily validates them, is, for Arendt, a radically mundane scenario that does not call into question any transcendence or religious instance of salvation.Jewish, secular, and classically trained in Greek and Latin, Arendt, who had little familiarity with the Jewish language and tradition, met Christian thought primarily through Saint Augustine, to whom she dedicated her doctoral thesis (Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin, published in Berlin in 1929 and then in English in 1996 as Love and Saint Augustine), and who remained a constant point of reference throughout her work. A phrase from Augustine—initium ut esset homo creatus est—present in the thesis, appears, in fact, in Arendt’s later texts, including The Human Condition, indeed with obsessive repetitiveness in reference to the category of birth.2 In her monumental work The Origins of Totalitarianism, published in 1951, a full seven years prior to The Human Condition, Arendt already writes: “Beginning, before it becomes a historical event, is the supreme capacity of man; politically, it is identical with man’s freedom. Initium ut esset homo creatus est, ‘that a beginning be made, man was created’, said Augustine. This beginning is guaranteed by each new birth; it is indeed every man” (Arendt 1973, 479). On the philosophically anomalous theme of birth, the contributions of the Christian tradition that Arendt does appreciate are predominantly two: the “glad tidings” that herald the coming of the child, and Augustine’s comments on the narrative of Creation.Natality, Birth, and the Human Condition of...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Violent Female Bodies: Questioning Thanatopolitics.Adriana Cavarero - 2015 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 36 (1):129-144.
Introduction.L. Jardine - 2000 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 22 (1):3-12.
Parent, Child, Alterity, Dialogue.David Kennedy - 2001 - Philosophy Today 45 (1):33-42.
Where the Wild Child Is.Rebecca Tuvel - 2013 - philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 3 (2):186-192.
Beyond “Born this Way”.Tim R. Johnston - 2015 - philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 5 (1):140-144.
Child’s Play.Jeffrey A. Bernstein - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):49-64.
Self, Others, Goods, Final Faith.Edward F. Mooney - 2011 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 32 (2):227-249.
The Expanding Horizons of Continental Philosophy.James Risser & Peg Birmingham - 2008 - Philosophy Today 52 (Supplement):3-3.
Recenterings of Continental Philosophy.Cynthia Willett & Leonard Lawler - 2010 - Philosophy Today 54 (Supplement):3-4.
Is Continental Philosophy Just Catholicism for Atheists?J. Aaron Simmons - 2008 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):94-111.
Refiguring Continental Philosophy.Peg Birmingham & James Risser - 2007 - Philosophy Today 51 (Supplement):3-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
17 (#843,162)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references