Animal Ethics Based on Friendship: A Reply

Journal of Animal Ethics 9 (1):1-5 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article critiques Fröding and Peterson’s account of friendship developed in their article “Animal Ethics Based on Friendship.” I deny their central claim that friendship between a farmer qua farmer and her cow is even possible. Further, I argue that even if such a relationship were possible, the lack of such a relation on our part in the case of free-living animals does not, contrary to their claim, give us moral license to eat them. I suggest that even though Fröding and Peterson’s friendship differential does not do the work it is intended to do, virtue ethics has other resources to help us discover a more virtuous relationship with animals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
20 (#1,123,941)

6 months
3 (#1,152,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Causey
Emory University

Citations of this work

The Badness of Death for Sociable Cattle.Daniel Story - forthcoming - Journal of Value Inquiry:1-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Ethics Based on Friendship.Barbro Frööding & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (1):58-69.
Why Friends Shouldn’t Let Friends Be Eaten.Jeff Jordan - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (2):309-322.

Add more references