Grothendieck’s theory of schemes and the algebra–geometry duality

Synthese 200 (3):1-41 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We shall address from a conceptual perspective the duality between algebra and geometry in the framework of the refoundation of algebraic geometry associated to Grothendieck’s theory of schemes. To do so, we shall revisit scheme theory from the standpoint provided by the problem of recovering a mathematical structure A from its representations \ into other similar structures B. This vantage point will allow us to analyze the relationship between the algebra-geometry duality and the structure-semiotics duality. Whereas in classical algebraic geometry a certain kind of rings can be recovered by considering their representations with respect to a unique codomain B, Grothendieck’s theory of schemes permits to reconstruct general rings by considering representations with respect to a category of codomains. The strategy to reconstruct the object from its representations remains the same in both frameworks: the elements of the ring A can be realized—by means of what we shall generally call Gelfand transform—as quantities on a topological space that parameterizes the relevant representations of A. As we shall argue, important dualities in different areas of mathematics can be understood as particular cases of this general pattern. In the wake of Majid’s analysis of the Pontryagin duality, we shall propose a Kantian-oriented interpretation of this pattern. We shall use this conceptual framework to argue that Grothendieck’s notion of functor of points can be understood as a “relativization of the a priori” that generalizes the relativization already conveyed by the notion of domain extension to more general variations of the corresponding domains.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whole and part in mathematics.John L. Bell - 2004 - Axiomathes 14 (4):285-294.
Sheaf Representations and Duality in Logic.Steve Awodey - 2021 - In Claudia Casadio & Philip J. Scott (eds.), Joachim Lambek: The Interplay of Mathematics, Logic, and Linguistics. Springer Verlag. pp. 39-57.
Duality in Logic and Language.Lorenz Demey, and & Hans Smessaert - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Algebraization, Transcendence, and D-Group Schemes.Jean-Benoît Bost - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (3-4):377-434.
Topological duality for Nelson algebras and its application.Andrzej Sendlewski - 1984 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 13 (4):215-219.
Duality in Off-Shell Electromagnetism.Martin Land - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (7):1245-1262.
Projective duality and the rise of modern logic.Günther Eder - 2021 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (4):351-384.


Added to PP

49 (#326,442)

6 months
12 (#220,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reconsidering Logical Positivism.Michael Friedman - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant and the Claims of Knowledge.Paul Guyer - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures.Patrick Suppes - 2002 - CSLI Publications (distributed by Chicago University Press).

View all 67 references / Add more references