The Shroud of Turin: A Historiographical Approach

Heythrop Journal 54 (3):414-423 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Criteria of historical assessment are applied to the Turin Shroud to determine which hypothesis relating to the image formation process is the most likely. To implement this, a ‘Minimal Facts’ approach is followed that takes into account only physicochemical and historical data receiving the widest consensus among contemporary scientists. The result indicates that the probability of the Shroud of Turin being the real shroud of Jesus of Nazareth is very high; historians and natural theologians should therefore pay it increased attention

Similar books and articles

Miracles and the Shroud of Turin.Stephen Griffith - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):34-49.
The Shroud of Turin. [REVIEW]Robert E. Groenewold - 1978 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 53 (4):458-460.
David Hume and the Mysterious Shroud of Turin.Edward L. Schoen - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):209 - 222.
The hybrid theory of time.Neil McKinnon - 1999 - Philosophical Papers 28 (1):37-53.
Can a historian of science be a scientific realist?Theodore Arabatzis - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S531-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-09

Downloads
1,014 (#12,704)

6 months
212 (#11,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Philosophia Christi 3 (2):327-328.
Warranted Christian Belief.P. Helm - 2001 - Mind 110 (440):1110-1115.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references