The role of beliefs in goal dynamics: prolegomena to a constructive theory of intentions
Synthese 155 (2):237-263 (2007)
Abstract
In this article we strive to provide a detailed and principled analysis of the role of beliefs in goal processing—that is, the cognitive transition that leads from a mere desire to a proper intention. The resulting model of belief-based goal processing has also relevant consequences for the analysis of intentions, and constitutes the necessary core of a constructive theory of intentions, i.e. a framework that not only analyzes what an intention is, but also explains how it becomes what it is. We discuss similarities and differences between our approach and other standard accounts of intention, in particular Bratman’s planning theory. The aim here is to question and refine the conceptual foundations of many theories of intentional action: as a consequence, although our analysis is not formal in itself, it is ultimately meant to have deep consequences for formal models of intentional agencyAuthor Profiles
DOI
10.1007/s11229-006-9156-3
My notes
Similar books and articles
Beliefs, intentions, and evolution: Old versus new psychological game theory.Jeffrey P. Carpenter & Peter Hans Matthews - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):158-159.
Differences in Ethical Beliefs, Intentions, and Behaviors The Role of Beliefs and Intentions in Ethics Research Revisited.James Weber & Janet Gillespie - 1998 - Business and Society 37 (4):447-467.
A logic of intentions and beliefs.Munindar P. Singh & Nicholas M. Asher - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):513 - 544.
Group intentions as equilibria.Sara Rachel Chant & Zachary Ernst - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):95 - 109.
Changing minds: The role of beliefs in cognitive dynamics.Fabio Paglieri - 2007 - Synthese 155 (2):163-166.
Intentions and potential intentions revisited.Xiaocong Fan & John Yen - 2012 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 22 (3):203-230.
Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior.Alfred R. Mele - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Arguments as Belief Structures: Towards a Toulmin Layout of Doxastic Dynamics?Fabio Paglieri & Cristiano Castelfranchi - unknown
Defining Ontological Categories in an Expansion of Belief Dynamics.Jan Westerhoff - 2002 - Logic and Logical Analysis 10 (3):199-210.
What are intentions?Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard - 2010 - In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--84.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
128 (#99,547)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2009-01-28
Downloads
128 (#99,547)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
The shared circuits model. How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation and mind reading.Susan L. Hurley - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):1-22.
AGM 25 Years: Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief Change.Eduardo Fermé & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):295 - 331.
AGM 25 Years: Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief Change.Eduardo Fermé & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):295-331.
Why argue? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation.Cristiano Castelfranchi & Fabio Paglieri - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (1):71-91.
References found in this work
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Essays on Actions and Events: Philosophical Essays Volume 1.Donald Davidson - 1970 - Clarendon Press.
Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency.Michael E. Bratman - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Truth and probability.Frank Ramsey - 1926 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. Routledge. pp. 52-94.