Semantic Web Regulatory Models: Why Ethics Matter

Philosophy and Technology 28 (1):33-55 (2015)

Abstract

The notion of validity fulfils a crucial role in legal theory. In the emerging Web 3.0, Semantic Web languages, legal ontologies, and normative multi-agent systems are designed to cover new regulatory needs. Conceptual models for complex regulatory systems shape the characteristic features of rules, norms, and principles in different ways. This article outlines one of such multilayered governance models, designed for the CAPER platform, and offers a definition of Semantic Web Regulatory Models . It distinguishes between normative-SWRM and institutional-SWRM. It also compares existing principles in privacy by design, linked open data , legal information institutes , and online dispute resolution . The article concludes by proposing the notion of Relational Law to summarize the ethical dimension of SWRM. Ethics are the only regulatory way to constitute a global space, out of the jurisdictional public domain set by national, international, or transnational law, and opposed to the private one

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-23

Downloads
31 (#373,353)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pompeu Casanovas Romeu
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona

References found in this work

The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press UK.
A Theory of Constitutional Rights.Robert Alexy - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Entanglement of Trust and Knowledge on the Web.Judith Simon - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):343-355.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Multi-Agent Legal Recommender System.Lucas Drumond & Rosario Girardi - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (2):175-207.
Regulatory Interpretation: Conversational or Constructive?Andromachi Georgosouli - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):361-384.
Cracking Down on Autonomy: Three Challenges to Design in IT Law. [REVIEW]U. Pagallo - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):319-328.
Formal Models of Awareness.Thomas Ågotnes & Natasha Alechina - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (2):105-106.
Normative Conflicts in Legal Reasoning.Giovanni Sartor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (2-3):209-235.