Is the Attention Economy Noxious?

Philosophers' Imprint 20 (17):1-13 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A growing amount of media is paid for by its consumers through their very consumption of it. Typically, this new media is web-based and paid for by advertising. It includes the services offered by Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube. We offer an ethical assessment of the attention economy, the market where attention is exchanged for new media. We argue that the assessment has ethical implications for how the attention economy should be regulated. To conduct the assessment, we employ two heuristics for evaluating markets. One is the “harm” criterion, which relates to whether the market tends to engender extremely harmful outcomes for individuals or society as a whole. The other is the “agency” criterion, which relates not to the outcomes of the market, but rather, to whether it somehow reflects or has its source in weakened agency. We argue that the attention economy animates concerns with respect to both criteria and that new media should be subject to the same sort of regulation as other harmful, addictive products.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral limits of the market: the case of consumer scoring data.Clinton Castro & Adam Pham - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (2):117-126.
The Global Economy and Kathie Lee: Public Relations and Media.Sally M. Alvarez - 2000 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 15 (2):77-88.
The Market Economy and Christian Ethics.Peter H. Sedgwick - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
‘From Political Economy to Economics’ and Beyond.Steve Fleetwood - 2012 - Historical Materialism 20 (3):61-80.
Serving the public and serving the market: A conflict of interest?John McManus - 1992 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (4):196 – 208.
The New Economy: Ethical Issues. [REVIEW]Antonio Argandoña - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (1):3 - 22.
Morality and the Market in China.John J. Hanafin - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-15

Downloads
609 (#27,576)

6 months
93 (#44,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Clinton Castro
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

Is there a Duty to Be a Digital Minimalist?Timothy Aylsworth & Clinton Castro - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (4):662-673.
Attention.Christopher Mole - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On the Duty to Be an Attention Ecologist.Tim Aylsworth & Clinton Castro - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (1):1-22.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references