Experience and a priori justification [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):665–671 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Laurence BonJour’s In Defense of Pure Reason is rich and challenging. It offers a tightly integrated attack on empiricism and defense of rationalism. The tight texture of argument makes it difficult to isolate and assess specific aspects of the book in a brief discussion. My goal is to examine the role of experience in BonJour’s conception of a priori justification.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2007

ISBN(s)

00318205

DOI

10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00134.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Experientially defeasible a priori justification.Joshua Thurow - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):596–602.
Apriority, reason, and induction in Hume.Houston Smit - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):313-343.
The Experiential Defeasibility and Overdetermination of A Priori Justification.Mikael Janvid - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:271-278.
The modal argument for a priori justification.Joachim Horvath - 2009 - Ratio 22 (2):191-205.
A priori knowledge, experience and defeasibility.Hamid Vahid - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):173 – 188.
Kant on justification in transcendental philosophy.Derk Pereboom - 1990 - Synthese 85 (1):25 - 54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#203,004)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Albert Casullo
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence Bonjour - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):657-663.

Add more references