- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A College Logic: An Introduction to the Study of Argument and Proof
New York, NY, USA: Macmillan (1934)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
A College Logic. An Introduction to the Study of Argument and Proof. [REVIEW]E. N. - 1936 - Journal of Philosophy 33 (5):138-138.
Is the ontological proof for God’s existence an ontological proof for God’s existence?Marcin Tkaczyk - 2007 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (4):289-309.
Argument and explanation in mathematics.Michel Dufour - 2013 - In Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński (ed.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013. pp. pp. 1-14..
Formalizing Informal Logic.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (4):508-538.
The Role of Logic in the Evaluation of Argument.Stephen Sayers Carey - 1984 - Dissertation, University of Oregon
Argument. Appreciation! Argument-Criticism: The "Aesthetics" of Informal Logic.Joel Rudinow - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).
INTRODUCTION: The evidential argument from evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1996 - In The Evidential Argument from Evil.
Which Modal Logic Is the Right One?John P. Burgess - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):81-93.
A Simplified Proof of the 0–1 Law for Existential Second‐Order Ackermann Sentences.Thierry Lacoste - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (3):413-418.
Formal Approaches to the Ontological Argument.Ricardo Silvestre & Jean-Yves Beziau - 2018 - Journal of Applied Logics 5 (7):1433-1440.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-11-17
Downloads
2 (#1,784,141)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
2021-11-17
Downloads
2 (#1,784,141)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo