Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’ by Powell and Scarffe

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):592-593 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this short commentary, I reflect on the new definition of disease proposed by Powell and Scarffe. I suggest that the method they appeal to as objective, namely, rational justification, is open to several criticisms, which I outline and discuss.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Expert System for Depression Diagnosis.Izzeddin A. Alshawwa, Mohammed Elkahlout, Hosni Qasim El-Mashharawi & Samy S. Abu-Naser - 2019 - International Journal of Academic Health and Medical Research (IJAHMR) 3 (4):20-27.
What is diagnosis? Some critical reflections.Caroline Whitbeck - 1981 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):319-329.
Health and disease: what can medicine do for philosophy?J. G. Scadding - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):118-124.
Human Rights.J. Enoch Powell - 1977 - Journal of Medical Ethics 3 (4):160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-17

Downloads
27 (#572,408)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Havi Carel
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

Making concepts work.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):569-570.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references