History of the Human Sciences 31 (3):3-20 (2018)

This article discusses the common ground between William James and the tradition of philosophical anthropology. Recent commentators on this overlap have characterised philosophical anthropology as combining science and Kantian teleology, for instance in Kant’s seminal definition of anthropology as being concerned with what the human being makes of itself, as distinct from what attributes it is given by nature. This article registers the tension between Kantian thinking, which reckons to ground experience in a priori categories, and William James’s psychology, which begins and ends with experience. It explores overlap between James’s approach and the characteristic holism of 18th-century philosophical anthropology, which centres on the idea of understanding and analysing the human as a whole, and presents the main anthropological elements of James’s position, namely his antipathy to separation, his concerns about the binomial terms of traditional philosophy, his preference for experience over substances, his sense that this holist doctrine of experience shows a way out of sterile impasses, a preference for description over causation, and scepticism. It then goes on to register the common ground with key ideas in the work of anthropologists from around 1800, along with some references to anthropologists who come in James’s wake, in particular Max Scheler and Arnold Gehlen, in order to reconceptualise the connection between James’s ideas and the tradition of anthropological thinking in German letters since the late 18th-century, beyond its characterisation as a combination of scientific positivism and teleology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0952695118764060
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Essays in Radical Empiricism.B. H. Bode, William James & R. B. Perry - 1912 - Philosophical Review 21 (6):704.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The ‘Migrant Experience’: An Analytical Discussion.Vince Marotta - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (4):591-610.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ruritania Revisited.Ned Block - 1995 - Philosophical Issues 6:171-187.
William James's "Will to Believe" Revisited.Hunter Brown - 1996 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
Is Content Holism Incoherent?Kirk A. Ludwig - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 46 (1):173-195.
The Unity of William James's Thought.Wesley Cooper - 2002 - Vanderbilt University Press.
Boas and Holism: A Textual Analysis.Michel Verdon - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):276-302.
William James.Max Carl Otto (ed.) - 1942 - Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #792,790 of 2,461,468 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,382 of 2,461,468 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes