Theory, Culture and Society 27 (1):110-129 (2010)
Abstract |
This article details how patent law works to create discrete, immutable biological ‘objects’. This socio-legal maneuver is necessary to distinguish these artifacts from the unwieldy realm of the natural world. The creation of ‘objects’ also serves the interests of capital, where a stable, unchanging, immutable object goes hand in hand with commodification. Yet this stabilization is incomplete. Pointing to a variety of different examples, this article illustrates how biotech patents do not speak to specific, immutable things. Biotech patents, rather, are better understood as ontologically fluid, which is to say their identity cannot be ‘fixed’ — or, at least, not without undermining the very existence of today’s biotechnology regime. The article concludes by speaking briefly about how this mutability is perpetuating certain inequalities, particularly between holders of various property forms.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1177/0263276409350360 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment.Richard Lewontin - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):611-612.
Norms and Ideology in Science.Michael J. Mulkay - 1976 - Social Science Information 15 (4-5):637-656.
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States. [REVIEW]Benjamin M. Cole & Preeta M. Banerjee - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3):555-574.
Strong Will in a Messy World. Ethics and the Government of Technoscience.Luigi Pellizzoni - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):257-272.
Similar books and articles
Intellectual Property and Biotechnology: Theoretical Arguments and Empirical Evidence.Clarissa Allen - unknown
Commercialization, Patents and Moral Assessment of Biotechnology Products.Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):273 – 284.
Labeling Products of Biotechnology: Towards Communication and Consent.Debra Jackson - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (3):319-330.
Are Life Patents Ethical? Conflict Between Catholic Social Teaching and Agricultural Biotechnology's Patent Regime.Keith Douglass Warner - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):301-319.
Surgical Patents and Patients — the Ethical Dilemmas.Tadeusz Tołłoczko - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):61-69.
Exploiting Abstract Possibilities: A Critique of the Concept and Practice of Product Patenting. [REVIEW]Hans Radder - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):275-291.
Patents, Innovation, and Privatization: Commentary On: “Data Management in Academic Settings: An Intellectual Property Perspective”.Ramona C. Albin - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):777-781.
Peer-Review and Patents: Why the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg is a Red Herring.Sivaramjani Thambisetty & Kartik Kumaramangalam - unknown
DNA Patents and Scientific Discovery and Innovation: Assessing Benefits and Risks.David B. Resnik - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):29-62.
The Ideal of Nature: Debates About Biotechnology and the Environment.Gregory E. Kaebnick (ed.) - 2011 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Agricultural Biotechnology Research: Practices, Consequences, and Policy Recommendations. [REVIEW]William B. Lacy, Laura R. Lacy & Lawrence Busch - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):3-14.
Review of Michael Resnik, Owning the Genome: A Moral Analysis of DNA Patenting. [REVIEW]Peter Murphy - 2004 - Politics and the Life Sciences 23:75-77.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-02-02
Total views
11 ( #856,162 of 2,520,399 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,399 )
2014-02-02
Total views
11 ( #856,162 of 2,520,399 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,399 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads