Should Repugnance Give Us Pause? On the Neuroscience of Daily Moral Reasoning

American Journal of Bioethics- Neuroscience 2 (2):47-48 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In our commentary we briefly review the work on the neurological differences between the rational ethical analysis used in professional contexts and the reflexive emotional responses of our daily moral reasoning, and discuss the implications for the claim that our normative arguments should not rely on the emotion of repugnance.

Other Versions

reprint Cardon, Aaron; Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. Swindell (2011) "Should Repugnance Give Us Pause? On the Neuroscience of Daily Moral Reasoning". American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2(2):47-48

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroethics.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Vilayanur Ramachandran, Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2e. Elsevier.
Reasons, reflection, and repugnance.Doug McConnell & Jeanette Kennett - 2016 - In Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal, The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Charles Sanders Peirce and Effective Altruism.Michael Haiden - 2024 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 59 (3):263-290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-23

Downloads
40 (#612,097)

6 months
1 (#1,599,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Swindell Blumenthal-Barby
Baylor College of Medicine

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references