Reply to KR Popper

In Imre Lakatos (ed.), The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam,: North Holland Pub. Co.. pp. 309--11 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of Popper's verisimilitude.Robert G. Meyers - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (3):213 - 218.
Popper's Psychologism: A Reply to Ball.Karl R. Popper - 1982 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (1):69-69.
Reply to professor Carnap.K. R. Popper - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (27):244-245.
Recovering popper: For the left?Bruce Caldwell - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):49-68.
A brand new type of inductive logic: Reply to Diderik Batens.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):248-252.
Popper's Communitarianism.Jeff Kochan - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272). Springer. pp. 287--303.
Lógica y ética en Karl Popper.Mariano Artigas - 2001 - Anuario Filosófico 34 (69):101-118.
Popper, political philosophy, and social democracy: Reply to Eidlin.Jeremy Shearmur - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):361-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references