Right‐wing postmodernism and the rationality of traditions

Zygon 52 (3):807-821 (2017)

Abstract

Modern thought typically opposes the authority of tradition in the name of universal reason. Postmodernism begins with the insight that the sociohistorical context of tradition and its authority is inevitable, even in modernity. Modernity can no longer take itself for granted when it recognizes itself as a tradition that is opposed to traditions. The left-wing postmodernist response to this insight is to conclude that because tradition is inevitable, irrationality is inevitable. The right-wing postmodernist response is to see traditions as the home of diverse forms of rationality. This requires an understanding of the Socratic, self-critical aspect of intellectual traditions, which include both modern sciences and the great world religions.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-19

Downloads
201 (#59,682)

6 months
25 (#36,091)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

MacIntyre and Taylor: Traditions, Rationality and Modernity.Arto Laitinen - 2015 - In Jeff Malpas & Hans-Helmuth Gander (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics. Routledge. pp. 204-215.
In Defense of the Rationality of Traditions.Peter Seipel - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):257-277.
The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism.Steven Connor (ed.) - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
The Religious Significance of Postmodernism: A Rejoinder.Huston Smith - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):409-422.

Author's Profile

Phillip Cary
Eastern University

References found in this work

Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
The Fragility of Goodness.Martha Nussbaum - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (7):376-383.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):363-363.
Edmund Husserl’s ‘Origin of Geometry’: An Introduction.Richard M. Martin - 1980 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (3):436-436.

View all 8 references / Add more references