Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):587 - 592 (1980)

Often Bertrand Russell defends his view that names differ from descriptions in that names have meaning but descriptions do not by using a “proof.” Recently in this journal it has been debated whether Russell's “proof” fails or not. The familiar objection to Russell's argument is that it is circular or it involves a sense/reference equivocation. Avrum Stroll suggests a novel criticism by making use of a “mirror argument“ which attempts to show that Russell's argument can be used to conclude that "Scott" has no meaning, and that thus the argument proves too much or nothing. Robert Fahrnkopf defends Russell's argument, but, I believe, he does not go far enough in his defense. So it will be useful to carry this debate a few steps further.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1080/00455091.1980.10715746
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How to Russell a Frege-Church.David Kaplan - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):716-729.
Russell's "Proof".Avrum Stroll - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):653 - 662.
Stroll on Russell's "Proof".Robert Fahrnkopf - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):569 - 578.
Four Comments on Russell's Theory of Deceptions.Avrum Stroll - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):147-155.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Russell's Completeness Proof.Peter Milne - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (1):31-62.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Russell’s Notion of Scope.Saul A. Kripke - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):1005-1037.
Russell's "Proof".Avrum Stroll - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):653 - 662.
Proof in Mathematics: An Introduction.James Franklin - 1996 - Sydney, Australia: Quakers Hill Press.
Russell's Proof of Realism Reproved.Herbert Hochberg - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (1):37 - 44.
Bertrand Russell, the Social Scientist.Bertrand Russell (ed.) - 1973 - Bertrand Russell Supranational Society.
Stroll on Russell's "Proof".Robert Fahrnkopf - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):569 - 578.
Incomplete Symbols and Russell's Proof.W. Kent Wilson - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):233 - 250.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #385,513 of 2,533,646 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,646 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes