Names, and what they are names of

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):69-70 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Terms designating substances and kinds function grammatically much like proper names of individuals. This supports Ruth Millikan's theory, but it also poses the question of how we can understand the reference of kind terms when the ontological status of the kind term is uncertain or disputed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The significance of names.Robin Jeshion - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):370-403.
Names as tokens and names as tools.M. W. Pelczar - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):133 - 155.
Proper names and persons: Peirce's semiotic consideration of proper names.Eric Thomas Weber - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 346-362.
The neuropsychology of proper names.Carlo Semenza - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):347-369.
Proper Names and their Fictional Uses.Heidi Tiedke - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):707 - 726.
Description-names.Eros Corazza - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):313-325.
Necessity and rigidly designating kind terms.Ben S. Cordry - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 119 (3):243-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#298,901)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Carlson
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references