Names and the de re/de dicto distinction

Philosophia 12 (3-4):357-361 (1983)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#210,389)

6 months
1 (#386,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
The Contingent a Priori and Rigid Designators.Keith S. Donnellan - 1977 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):12-27.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Stich againstde dicto‐de reambiguity.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):223-230.
Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference.Gideon Makin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.
Singular Propositions, Abstract Constituents, and Propositional Attitudes.Edward N. Zalta - 1989 - In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 455--78.
The "De Dicto/De Re" Distinction in Relation to Actions.Martin Bell - 1983 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:159 - 173.
Are Desires de Dicto Fetishistic?Jonas Olson - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):89 – 96.
Names and the 'de Re — de Dicto' Distinction.G. W. Fitch - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (1):25 - 34.