Moral Responsibility, Psychiatric Disorders and Duress

Journal of Applied Philosophy 8 (1):45-56 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper is a discussion of moral responsibility and excuses in regard to psychiatric disorders involving abnormal desires (e.g. impulse control disorders such as kleptomania and pyromania, psychosexual disorders such as exhibitionism, obsessive‐compulsive disorder and others). It points out problems with previous approaches to the question of whether or not to excuse persons with these disorders, and offers a new approach based on the concept of duress. There is a discussion of duress in regard to non‐psychiatric cases based on the core notion of duress involving a choice between undesirables, and the paper concludes with an argument that moral blame for individuals with these sorts of disorders should often be lessened and in some cases removed entirely.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carl Elliott
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

Distinctive duress.Craig K. Agule - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (4):1007-1026.
Moral insanity and practical reason.Carl Elliott & Grant Gillett - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (1):53 – 67.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Necessitate Without Inclining.André Gombay - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (4):579-.

Add more references