Mirroring cannot account for understanding action

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):23-24 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Susan Hurley's shared circuits model (SCM) rightly begins in action and progresses through a series of layers; but it fails to reach action understanding because it relies on mirroring as a driving force, draws on heavily criticized theories, and neglects the need for shared experience in our grasp of social understanding

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,105

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
89 (#229,855)

6 months
13 (#230,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Enactive processing of the syntax of sign language.Christopher Mole & Graham H. Turner - 2019 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (2):317-332.
Names, Descriptions, and Assertion.Ray Buchanan - 2014 - In Zsu-Wei Hung (ed.), Communicative Action. Springer. pp. 03-15.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2004 - MIT Press.
The Emotions.Nico Frijda - 1986 - Cambridge University Press.
How the Body Shapes the Mind.Shaun Gallagher - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 96 references / Add more references