Infanticide and the Right to Life

Ratio 10 (1):1-9 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michael Tooley defends infanticide by analysing ‘A has a right to X’ as roughly synonymous with ‘If A desires X, then others are under a prima facie obligation to refrain from actions that would deprive him [or her] of it.’ An infant who cannot conceive of himself or herself as a continuing subject of experiences cannot desire to continue existing. Hence, on Tooley’s analysis, killing the infant is not impermissible, for it does not go against any of the infant’s desires. However, Tooley’s argument in support of his analysis seems to justify, instead, a slightly more subtle analysis—namely, ‘A has a right to X’ is roughly extensionally equivalent with ‘Unless A expresses his or her desire that not‐X, then others are under a prima facie obligation to refrain from actions that would deprive him or her of X.’ But given this analysis, the infant’s purported lack of any capacity to conceive of himself or herself as a continuing subject of experiences implies that we cannot be released from any duty that we might have not to harm him or her. In short, Tooley’s argument in support of his analysis actually implies that infanticide may well be impermissible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Michael Tooley on Possible People and Promising.Helga Kuhse - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (3):353.
Infanticide and moral consistency.Jeff McMahan - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):273-280.
Prima facie obligation and doing the best one can.Michael J. Zimmerman - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 78 (2):87 - 123.
Can infants have interests in continued life?Chris Kaposy - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):301-330.
Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?Charles Camosy - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):301-302.
Abortion and Infanticide.Michael Wreen - 1989 - Noûs 23 (5):690-696.
Abortion and Infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy 59 (230):545-547.
Abortion and infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1):37-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
15 (#809,217)

6 months
6 (#202,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references