Hungarian Philosophical Review 2020 (Self, Narrativity, Emotions):15 (2020)

Authors
James Cartlidge
Central European University (PhD)
Abstract
Martin Heidegger often and emphatically claimed that his work, especially in his masterpiece Being and Time, was not philosophical anthropology. He conceived of his project as ‘fundamental ontology’, and argued that because it is singularly concerned with the question of the meaning of Being in general (and not ‘human being’), this precluded him from being engaged in philosophical anthropology. This is a claim we should find puzzling because at the very heart of Heidegger’s project is an analysis of the structures of the existence of ‘Dasein’, an entity that human beings are an instantiation of, the entity that has a relationship of concern towards its existence and which is capable of raising the question of the meaning of Being. Heidegger argues that because he only analyses human beings insofar as they are Daseins, he cannot be doing philosophical anthropology, but only fundamental ontology. In this paper, I refute this claim. I provide a sketch of philosophical anthropology which conceives it as the other side of anthropology’s coin. Where anthropology is concerned with understanding human difference, philosophical anthropology attempts to understand what is common to all instances of human existence and elucidate its significant features and structures. Whether he likes it or not, Heidegger is engaged in exactly this kind of project because anything that applies truly to Dasein applies truly to human beings. With this in mind, I examine Heidegger’s analysis of moods to demonstrate that Heidegger’s work is best understood as involving a kind of philosophical anthropology.
Keywords Heidegger  Moods  Emotions  Philosophical Anthropology  Existentialism  Phenomenology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1724 - Macmillan Company.
Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics.Martin Heidegger - 1962 - Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How is a Phenomenology of Fundamental Moods Possible?Tanja Staehler - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):415 – 433.
Changing Moods.Hagi Kenaan - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (4):1469-1479.
Anxiety and Boredom in the Covid-19 Crisis: A Heideggerian Analysis.James Cartlidge - 2020 - Biblioteca Della Libertà (Covid-19: A Global Challenge):22.
Moods in Layers.Achim Stephan - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (4):1481-1495.
Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism.Piotr Hoffman - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):403 – 411.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-28

Total views
33 ( #335,329 of 2,463,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #26,156 of 2,463,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes