Gender, Management Styles, and Forms of Capital

Journal of Business Ethics 153 (2):357-373 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Extant research notes a tendency to propound the idea that female managers are secondary to men. Gender differences constitute an ethical issue and the discursive constructions of gender management are central to research in business ethics. Drawing on evidence gathered from a time–space intersection that has been widely neglected by research in this area, we address whether female business leaders develop gender-stereotypic management styles as well as their propensity to adopt masculine management patterns such as making risky decisions and implementing formal management systems. Our findings suggest that gender-stereotypic management styles are chosen strategically and target-driven, which implies a selective use of masculine and feminine management styles. Furthermore, as part of the masculine approach, female business owners adopt risk-taking decisions and implement formal management systems. Our results provide support for the argument that gender is context dependent and, hence, the findings of this study may be useful for contemporary jurisdictions featuring male-dominated societies and a strong intervention by the State in the economy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Capital.Mario Tronti - 1973 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1973 (17):98-121.
Gender.Claire Colebrook - 2003 - Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-20

Downloads
19 (#750,145)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?