Future Displacement and Modality

Abstract

In this survey article, I discuss the variety of ways in which language allows us to talk about the future. Topics discussed include how the category of predictive expressions broadly understood relates to the syntactic category of tense; what it means to say that a language does not have tense; how predictiveness relates to modality; and finally technical issue concerning the scope of negation in a semantics that is capable of shifting evaluation towards the future.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

What the Future ‘Might’ Brings.David Boylan - 2020 - Mind 129 (515):809-829.
Why will is not a modal.Mikhail Kissine - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (2):129-155.
Some Problems with the Russellian Open Future.Jacek Wawer - 2018 - Acta Analytica 33 (4):413-425.
Contingencies within Spacetime.Baptiste Le Bihan - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Rennes 1

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-28

Downloads
624 (#26,573)

6 months
211 (#11,710)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabrizio Cariani
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English.Richard Montague - 1973 - In Patrick Suppes, Julius Moravcsik & Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht. pp. 221--242.
The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English.Richard Montague - 1974 - In Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Future contingents and relative truth.John MacFarlane - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):321–336.

View all 19 references / Add more references