Educational Background, Modes of Discourse and Argumentation: Comparing Women and Men [Book Review]

Argumentation 18 (4):403-426 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyses the way in which discourse and argumentation may vary depending on participants’ educational level and gender. Men and women from three different educational levels (literacy, advanced level and university students) participated in discussion groups that debated about women and work, the sharing of housework and the way in which girls and boys are educated. The results showed important differences depending on participants’ educational level and gender. In general, the main differences were related to educational level, while gender tended to interact with educational level, as a moderating factor

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Woman and the gift of reason.Agnes Verbiest - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):821-836.
Neuroscience and Education: Blind Spots in a Strange Relationship.Volker Kraft - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (3):386-396.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
20 (#656,247)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Uses of Argument.Stephen Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.

View all 16 references / Add more references