Ekphrasis and interpretation: Two modes of art history writing

British Journal of Aesthetics 27 (1):20-31 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjaesthetics/27.1.20

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

David carrier's art history.Jonathan Gilmore - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):39-47.
Modes of interpretation and interpretative constraints.Stein Haugom Olsen - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):135-148.
Between philosophy and poetry: writing, rhythm, and history.Massimo Verdicchio & Robert Burch (eds.) - 2002 - New York: Continuum.
Ekphrasis and the postmodern painter poem.Michael Davidson - 1983 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (1):69-79.
Erwin Panofsky, Leo Steinberg, David carrier: The problem of objectivity in art historical interpretation.David Carrier - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):333-347.
Art as Its Own Interpretation.Nicholas Maxwell - 2003 - In Andreea Ruvoi (ed.), Interpretation and Its Objects: Studies in the Philosophy of Michael Krausz. Rodopi.
Modern theories of art.Moshe Barasch - 1990 - New York: New York University Press. Edited by Moshe Barasch.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#158,920)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references