Democratizing Knowledge: Sustainable and Conventional Agricultural Field Days as Divergent Democratic Forms

Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (4):508-528 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article highlights that in our rush to call for the democratization of science and expertise we must not forget to speak to what type of democratization we are calling for. In short, not all participatory forms are the same. In developing this argument, I examine one such form that has yet to receive much attention from science and technology studies scholars: the agricultural field day. In examining the field day, we find that its orientation—that is, toward either the conventional or sustainable model of agriculture—shapes significantly its democratic approach to knowledge coproduction. To help inform how we understand conventional and sustainable field days, I turned to two conceptual frameworks of participation: namely, that of Wynne and Funtowicz and Ravetz. In doing this, we find that conventional field days mirror closely that form of public participation detailed by Funtowicz and Ravetz, while sustainable field days reflect that conceptualized by Wynne.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Community-Based Participatory Research Postnormal Science?David Bidwell - 2009 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 34 (6):741-761.
Call for Participation.[author unknown] - 2010 - Agriculture and Human Values 27 (4):535-537.


Added to PP

6 (#1,504,708)

6 months
5 (#882,313)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?