Can Russell avoid Frege's sense?

&
Mind 88 (351):384-393 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/lxxxviii.1.384

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysicians of Meaning: Russell and Frege on Sense and Denotation.Gideon Makin - 2000 - Routledge.
Russell's Paradox in Appendix B of the Principles of Mathematics : Was Frege's response adequate?Kevin C. Klement - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):13-28.
Frege's Theory of Sense and Reference: Some Exegetical Notes.Saul A. Kripke - 2008 - Theoria 74 (3):181-218.
Russell's paradox in consistent fragments of Frege's grundgesetze der arithmetik.Kai F. Wehmeier - 2004 - In Godehard Link (ed.), One Hundred Years of Russell’s Paradox. de Gruyter.
Frege-Russell numbers: Analysis or explication?Erich Reck - 2007 - In The Analytic Turn. London: Routledge. pp. 33-50.
The history or Russell's concepts 'sense-data' and 'knowledge by acquaintance'.Nikolay Milkov - 2001 - Archiv Fuer Begriffsgeschichte 43:221-231.
Frege‐Russell Semantics?Howard Wettstein - 1990 - Dialectica 44 (1‐2):113-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#232,145)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Russel/'s.James D. Carney - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):587-592.
Russell's "Proof", Again.James D. Carney - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):587 - 592.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references