Cartesian epistemology

Abstract

This paper argues that a Cartesian belief in the self-transparency of minds might actually be an innate aspect of our mind-reading faculty. But it acknowledges that some crucial evidence needed to establish this claim hasn’t been looked for or collected. What we require is evidence that a belief in the self-transparency of mind is universal to the human species. The paper closes with a call to anthropologists (and perhaps also developmental psychologists), who are in a position to collect such evidence, encouraging them to do so.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Hylomorphism and Post-Cartesian Philosophy of Mind.William Jaworski - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:209-224.
Dennett's mind.Michael Lockwood - 1993 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (1-2):59-72.
From cartesian epistemology to cartesian metaphysics.Peter J. Markie - 1985 - Philosophical Topics 13 (2):195-204.
The ethics of belief.Andrew Chignell - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Intuitions in linguistics.Michael Devitt - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):481-513.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#215,841)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Carruthers
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references