Continuing conflict and stalemate: A note

Abstract

This note is about the possibility of a stalemate in a continuing conflict. Following the prevailing economic literature on the topic, under some assumptions, the outcome of a conflict can be described in two ways: (i) a predetermined split of a contested output; (ii) a winner-take-all contest where the winning agent is capable to grab all the contested stake. By contrast, in reality many disputes do not have a clear or a definite outcome. A stalemate can end the conflict with the result of a draw. To allow for a stalemate, some formal modifications to the classical Hirshleifer's model of conflict are needed. In particular, the possibility of a stalemate can be captured through a modified form of the Contest Success Function as axiomatized by Blavatskyy (2004). Under the possibility of a stalemate, the scenario exhibits a higher level of 'guns' than Hirshleifer's classical model. At the same time, it also exhibits a lower degree of entropy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Enhancing Authenticity.Neil Levy - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):308-318.
Natural enemies: An anatomy of environmental conflict.David Schmidtz - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (4):397-408.
"Di" 9: An exegetical stalemate.Lynne Spellman - 1980 - Apeiron 14 (2):115 - 124.
Access denied to zombies.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Unpublished (1):1-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2 (#1,784,141)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references