Abstract
Nearly all of the scant comparative work on Søren Kierkegaard and Confucius places the two starkly at odds with each other. Kierkegaard is pictured as the paradigmatic exemplar of the Western self: a discrete rights-bearing and volitional atom who is quite alone in the world, while Confucius, by contrast, is the paradigmatic exemplar of the Eastern self: a complex and irreducibly embedded communitarian bundle of relations and rich social roles. In this article, I challenge this oppositional approach, since it is both erroneous and obscures fruitful dialogue between the two on conceptually commensurate problems. I argue that Kierkegaard offers a relational ontology of the self which moves in a Confucian direction, that subjectivity and relational reciprocity are not fundamentally at odds in the two thinkers, that both thinkers value a life of harmonious integration that entails right relation to others, and finally that Confucius’ appeal to Heaven as a source of normativity allows for salutary social critique of prevailing ethical norms and practices, in a way that provides important comparative insights with Kierkegaardian theism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11712-018-9626-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):384-394.
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Samuel Scheffler - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (3):443.
Morals From Motives.Michael A. Slote - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kierkegaard and Confucius: The Religious Dimensions of Ethical Selfhood.George B. Connell - 2009 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (2):133-149.
The Moral Self in Confucius and Aristotle.May Sim - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):439-462.
Virtue Ethics, The.Edward Slingerland - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):97-125.
Kierkegaard and the Phenomenology of Selfhood.Michael Strawser - 2014 - International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (1):59-74.
A Companion to Kierkegaard.Jon Stewart (ed.) - 2015 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed.Yong Huang - 2013 - Bloomsbury Publishing.
Kierkegaard's Social Theory.J. Michael Tilley - 2014 - Heythrop Journal 55 (5):944-959.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-28

Total views
11 ( #848,671 of 2,498,526 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,526 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes