Conclusion

In Kant and the Scandal of Philosophy: The Kantian Critique of Cartesian Scepticism. University of Toronto Press. pp. 173-176 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two types of multiple-conclusion systems.A. Avron - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (5):695-718.
In defence of repugnance.Michael Huemer - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):899-933.
Probability and scepticism.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - In Dylan Dodd Elia Zardini (ed.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-86.
Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
The Very Repugnant Conclusion.Gustaf Arrhenius - 2003 - In Krister Segerberg & Ryszard Sliwinski (eds.), Logic, Law, Morality: Thirteen Essays in Practical Philosophy in Honour of Lennart Åqvist. Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University. pp. 29-44.
Does the repugnant conclusion have any probative force?Christopher Cowie - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3021-3039.
Some multi-conclusion modal paralogics.Casey McGinnis - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (2):335-353.
Negative Average Preference Utilitarianism.Roger Chao - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 2 (1):55-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luigi Caranti
Università degli Studi di Catania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references