Beliefs, intentions, and evolution: Old versus new psychological game theory

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):158-159 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We compare Colman's proposed “psychological game theory” with the existing literature on psychological games (Geanakoplos et al. 1989), in which beliefs and intentions assume a prominent role. We also discuss experimental evidence on intentions, with a particular emphasis on reciprocal behavior, as well as recent efforts to show that such behavior is consistent with social evolution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond rationality: Rigor without mortis in game theory.Andrew M. Colman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):180-192.
The content of intentions.Elisabeth Patherie - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.
Social systems.Heidi L. Maibom - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (5):557 – 578.
Explaining fairness in complex environments.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):81-97.
A logic of intentions and beliefs.Munindar P. Singh & Nicholas M. Asher - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):513 - 544.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#488,695)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references