Bargaining and Strategic Demand Commitment

Theory and Decision 54 (4):357-374 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On occasion, in multilateral negotiations, interested parties make unilateral demands. Certain agreements need unanimity. However, a lesser degree of consensus may be feasible. In this paper, an alternating demand bargaining game among n players is proposed, which envisages varying consensus requirements and commitment, both crucial in generating a unique and efficient outcome of the bargaining process

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolution and ultimatum bargaining.William Harms - 1997 - Theory and Decision 42 (2):147-175.
Loss Aversion and Bargaining.Jonathan Shalev - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.
The will: Interpersonal bargaining versus intrapersonal prediction.Luca Ferrero - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):654-655.
Divide-the-Dollar Game Revisited.Nejat Anbarci - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (4):295-303.
Rational cooperation.Edward McClennen - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):65-93.
Uniqueness and symmetry in bargaining theories of justice.John Thrasher - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):683-699.
Explaining fairness in complex environments.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):81-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
46 (#338,714)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Delay in a bargaining game with contracts.Yi-Chun Chen & Xiao Luo - 2008 - Theory and Decision 65 (4):339-353.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references