Pragmatics and Philosophy. Connections and Ramifications

Springer Verlag (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book shows how pragmatics and philosophy are interconnected, and explores the consequences and ramifications of this innovative idea, especially in addressing and solving the problem of breaking Grice's circle. The author applies philosophy in order to get to a better understanding of pragmatics, and pragmatics in order to get a better understanding of philosophy. The book starts with a chapter on the non-cancellability of explicatures and the role that this idea plays in the resolution of Grice’s circle, and proceeds with the discussion of other topics in which explicatures or cancellability play an important and decisive role. While the reader proceeds in the reading of this book, they accumulate notions and pieces of knowledge which will be of invaluable use when arriving at the chapter on conversational presuppositions, where the author expresses his most radical views: namely that presuppositions are indeed cancellable, contrary to what many believe.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Maier on the Alleged Transparency of Mixed Quotation

In this chapter I propose, unlike Maier , that quoted fragments in so called ‘mixed quotations’ are opaque. This view of opacity is required, we propose, to preserve the difference between direct and indirect reports, direct reports involving possibly high levels of literality, accuracy and granular... see more

Indirect Reports and Societal Pragmatics

Indirect reports are segments of speech which involve a dialogic dimension and, thus, studying them offers a chance for linguistics to again appropriate its original status as a theory that deals with linguistic signs and communication. The practice of indirect reporting intersects with a theory of ... see more

Quotation With and Without Quotation Marks

This chapter presents a purely pragmatic account of quotation and argues that it is able to accommodate all relevant linguistic phenomena. Given that it is more parsimonious to explain the data only by reference to pragmatic principles than to explain them by reference to both pragmatic and semantic... see more

The Clitic ‘lo’ in Italian, Propositional Attitudes and Presuppositions

In this chapter I have used pronominal clitics in Italian in combination with verbs of propositional attitude to shed light on the opacity effects caused by intrusive pragmatics . Certain problems, as discussed by Schiffer The pragmatics of propositional attitude reports. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 14–30,... see more

Conversational Presuppositions. Presupposition as Defeasible Inference

Is presupposition a semantic or genuinely pragmatic notion? My answer in this paper is that it is a pragmatic notion and I provide explanantions for this view, mainly related to cancellability. Of course, it is not easy to extract theoretical considerations from data and it is possible that one give... see more

What Happens When We Report Grammatical, Lexical and Morphological Errors?

In this chapter I expatiate on what happens when one has to indirectly report ungrammatical utterances. How can the issue of grammatical, lexical and morphological errors affect our understanding of the practice of indirect reporting? What kind of problems are generated by such issues? The general p... see more

First Person Implicit Indirect Reports

In this paper, I deal with implicit indirect reports. First of all, I discuss implicit indirect reports involving the first person. Then, I prove that in some cases second person reports are implicit indirect reports involving a de se attribution. Next, I draw analogies with implicit indirect report... see more

Knowing How and the Semantics/Pragmatics Debate

In this chapter, I deal with know how vs. know that from a linguistic point of view and I point out a number of pragmatic inferential phenomena. It is of some interest that this is a chapter in which linguistics and philosophy intersect and that a linguistic treatment of inferential behavior has to ... see more

The Pragmatics of Referential and Attributive Expressions

In this chapter I deal with the attributive/referential distinction. After reviewing the literature on the issue, I adopt Jaszczolt’s view based on default semantics. I relate her view to Sperber & Wilson’s Principle of Relevance. I argue in favour of the modularity hypothesis in connection with pra... see more

On the Tension Between Semantics and Pragmatics

In this chapter, I offer my reflections on the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. I argue that semantics – the relatively stable and context-invariant meanings of language – is necessarily amplified by pragmatics, which is a way of transcending the possibilities of semantics. Pragmatic l... see more

On the Nature of Pragmatic Increments at the Truth-Conditional Level

The aim of this chapter is to reflect on the necessity of the pragmatic development of propositional forms and to reach a better understanding of the level of meaning that Sperber and Wilson and Carston famously call ‘explicatures’ and to support the claim that explicatures are not cancellable – unl... see more

On a Theory-Internal Problem in the Semantics/Pragmatics Debate: How to Resolve Grice’s Circle

In this chapter, I reconsider the discussion of the semantics/pragmatics debate and rejuvenate it by means of two important ideas: Grice’s circle ) is apparent and certainly not pernicious; the fact that explicatures are not cancellable means that the pragmatics we consider in pragmatic intrusion ha... see more

Pragmatics and Philosophy

In this book, I shall argue that there is a close relationship between pragmalinguistics and philosophy and that pragmalinguistics not only takes into account empirical investigations based on language use, but also takes advantage of a more philosophical approach to language, where a number of a pr... see more

Conversational Presuppositions. Presupposition as Defeasible (And Non-defeasible) Inference

Is presupposition a semantic or genuinely pragmatic notion? My answer in this paper is that it is a pragmatic notion and I provide explanantions for this view, mainly related to cancellability. Of course, it is not easy to extract theoretical considerations from data and it is possible that one give... see more

Pragmatics and Philosophy (and the Semantics/Pragmatics Debate)

In this book, I shall argue that there is a close relationship between pragmalinguistics and philosophy and that pragmalinguistics not only takes into account empirical investigations based on language use, but also takes advantage of a more philosophical approach to language, where a number of a pr... see more

Similar books and articles

On the tension between semantics and pragmatics.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - RASK: International Journal of Language and Communication 37:5-38.
Barack Obama’s South Carolina Speech.Alessandro Capone - 2010 - Journal of Pragmatics 42:2964–2977.
Pragmatics and the philosophy of mind.Marcelo Dascal - 1983 - Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
On Grice's circle.Alessandro Capone - 2006 - Journal of Pragmatics 38:645-669.
The pragmatic circle.Kepa Korta & John Perry - 2008 - Synthese 165 (3):347 - 357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-01

Downloads
9 (#1,219,856)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references