On the Uselessness of the Distinction between Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory (at least in the Philosophy of Language)

In Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy of Language (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There’s an interesting debate in moral and political philosophy about the nature of, and relationship between, ideal and non-ideal theory. In this paper we discuss whether an analogous distinction can be drawn in philosophy of language. Our conclusion is negative: Even if you think that distinction can be put to work within moral and political philosophy, there’s no useful way to extend it to work that has been done in the philosophy of language.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three Failed Charges against Ideal Theory.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (1):19-44.
Ideal Language Philosophy and Experiments on Intuitions.Sebastian Lutz - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):117-139.
Incomplete Ideal Theory.Amy Berg - 2019 - Social Theory and Practice 45 (4):501-524.
Towards a ‘Non‐Ideal’ Non‐Ideal Theory.Brian Carey - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):147-162.
The Meaning of Political Philosophy Between the Ideal and Non-ideal Theory.Reima Launonen - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:235-239.
Race, ideology, and ideal theory.James Boettcher - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (2):237-259.
Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics.Andrew Mason - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (5):658-683.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-15

Downloads
1,069 (#11,697)

6 months
342 (#5,614)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Herman Cappelen
University of Hong Kong
Josh Dever
University of Texas at Austin