Journal of Business Ethics 28 (2):95 - 107 (2000)

This study compares computer-supported groups, i.e., groups using group support systems (GSS), and face-to-face groups using ethical decision-making tasks. A laboratory experiment was conducted using five-person groups of information systems professionals. Face-to-face (FTF) and GSS groups were compared in terms of their decision outcomes and group members' reactions. The results revealed that computer-supported and face-to-face groups showed no significant difference in terms of the decision outcomes of choice shift and decision polarity. However, FTF groups reached their decisions more quickly and they were more successful in attaining group consensus than GSS groups. Subjects evaluated face-to-face communication more favorably than GSS interaction on most post-group measures related to perceived group processes and satisfaction. Despite these outcomes, some possibilities for using GSS technology in an ethical decision making context are examined.
Keywords group ethical decision making  group support systems  information systems  laboratory experiment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1006344825235
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Towards a Design Science of Ethical Decision Support.Kieran Mathieson - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3):269-292.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #345,440 of 2,505,614 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,614 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes